高考阅读模拟_高考数学理模拟

其他范文 时间:2020-02-29 01:54:45 收藏本文下载本文
【www.daodoc.com - 其他范文】

高考阅读模拟由刀豆文库小编整理,希望给你工作、学习、生活带来方便,猜你可能喜欢“高考数学理模拟”。

A

Young women are losing faith in the university system with nearly half believing it is not worth getting a degree.Tuition fees and little chance of landing a good job make higher education an unattractive prospect for them, a study suggests.It found that nearly half of female graduates would not go to university if they had the chance again.The research will cause concern because it was carried out before the Government announced that fees will almost treble to £9,000 in 2012.The findings have prompted warnings that a generation of ambitious young women will mi out on a high-flying career and the opportunity to continue their education.Louise Court, editor of Cosmopolitan magazine, which conducted the survey, said young women seem to think university „a waste of time‟.„It‟s never been harder to be a young woman with ambition,‟ she said.„Understandably, women are angry and frustrated about their future and this is having a damaging affect on their self-esteem.The survey of 1,353 women also looked at the career prospects and financial outlook for women in 2011.Two thirds of those questioned said they thought it would be „almost impoible‟ to get their dream job and a quarter were unable to follow their preferred career.Only 14 per cent said they felt safe from the sack.And the financial situation for graduates was especially bad, with half saying they had so much student debt they could not save.The same proportion believed they faced worse financial hardship than their parents.One in seven women said they had been forced admitted that financial constraints had made them postpone trying to start a family.Vicky Tuck, a campaigner for women‟s education and former head of Cheltenham Ladies College, said: „The rise in fees is going to make a lot of people reflect on why they are going to university.„Before the introduction of fees it was not an automatic aumption that a degree would lead to a good job.It is only recently that we have seen that relationship.„I believe that women should only go to university if they have a genuine interest in learning, a precious opportunity.If they go purely to get a job, many will be disappointed.‟

1.According to the paage, which of the following statements is true?(原创)

A.More than half of young women hold the view that there is no point going to university.B.It is because the government decided to increase the tuition fees that young women don‟t want to go to university.C.It doesn‟t matter whether young women go to university

D.Ambitious young women won‟t be able to find a good job if they give up going for higher education.2.What can we infer from the fourth paragraph?(原创)

A.The up-rising expenses have great impact on a lot of young women.B.Only a small number of young women has been influenced by high living expenses.C.High tuition fees is only one reason for women choosing not to go to university.D.The majority of young women believe that they will have bright future.3.What does the underlined word “postpone” mean?(原创)

A.to put offB.to put awayC.to settle down toD.to turn back

4.Young women choose not to go for higher education mainly because__________.(原创)

A.They want to start their career earlier.B.They don‟t like the campus life of university

C.They have lost heart about their future.D.They can‟t afford their tuition fees.5.According to Vicky Tuck, ____________.(原创)

A.A higher degree will lead to a better job.B.Going to university should be based on a real interest in learning.C.Higher education can help young women to build up their self-esteem.D.Young women can‟t go to university because they haven‟t the opportunity.6.What‟s the best title of the paage?(原创)

A.The Dark FutureB.Is University a Waste of Time?

C.Little chance for young women to get a good jobD.Start their career earlier.Key DAACBB

B

That might sound obvious to some people, but studies have historically shown there's more to happine than money.In the 1970s, economist Richard Easterlin argued that increasing average income did not raise average well-being, a claim that became known as the Easterlin Paradox.that effect fizzles once the income you earn is able to buy your basic needs--food, shelter, and the like.Somehow that idea carried into popular notion but was never really formally tested.Now University of Michigan economists Justin Wolfers and Betsey Stevenson have examined data for more than 150 countries from sources including the World Bank and the Gallup World Poll.The husband-and-wife team found that the more money people have the happier they are, regardle of whether they're rich or poor.And contrary to earlier studies, there isn't a cutoff point where making more than a certain amount doesn't lead to more happine.Needle to say, happine is a relative term.What does it mean to be happy, anyway?

Even America's millionaires don't think of themselves as rich, as Fortune's Dan Primack has pointed out.So are they any le happy than poorer folks scraping by earning minimum wage?Not exactly.It just takes more money to make the super-rich happier, Wolfers and Stevenson note in their study, which is to be published in the May 2013 American Economic Review.In fact, the study found zero unhappy millionaires.Their analysis adds to the collection of studies on happine that have long interested economists.To be sure, there are two kinds of happinees: The day-to-day kind that focuses on your daily mood vs.what Princeton University economist Angus Deaton and famed psychologist Daniel Kahneman call “life aement,” which means broader satisfaction with your place in the world.In their 2010 study, they found that day-to-day happine rises as people earn more money, but once they hit $75,000 a year, they don't get any happier.Admittedly that threshold seems arbitrary in places like New York City, where, as The New York Times recently highlighted, middle-cla is a vague cla, since incomes there vary so widely.Nonethele, according to Deaton and Kahneman, the more money people have, the more likely they'll feel they have a better life.This taps into the keeping up with the Joneses mindset: If I earn more, I could buy a fancier car than Mr.Jones next door.Or if I earn more, I may be able to donate more of my fortune than Warren Buffett or some other rich person.Wolfers's and Stevenson's study speaks to the latter kind of happine, where fulfillment is infinite so long as your income rises.This makes a lot of sense.Money, while it can't always buy happine, is an important means to achieving higher living standards.In the U.S., the average person earns $37,708 a year, according to the Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development.That's more than the average of $22,387 of the OECD's 34-member developed countries.Overall, the U.S.ranks pretty high in the OECD's Better Life Index, which measures the happine of countries based on, among other things, acce to education and health care.Though Americans are generally happy, there are still a lot of unhappy folks if money does indeed buy happine.There's a considerable gap between the richest and poorest--the top 20% of the population earn about eight times as much as the bottom 20%.So if happine is what you want, look inward, rather than what your neighbors might have.Sounds obvious, but sometimes it takes a team of economists to prove it.1.According to the auther, happine_________.(原创)

A.has nothing to do with one‟s income.B.can always be bought with money.C.can be sorted into two kinds.D.will certainly go up as one‟s income rises

2.What can we infer from this paage?(原创)

A.The super-rich must be very happy because they take poeion of large sum of money.B.In spite of the proof that money can buy happine, the rich may feel they are sometimes unhappy.C.Exactly speaking, money can‟t buy happine.D.There is no way to tell whether a person is happy or not.3.According to Wolfers and Stevenson, _____________.(原创)

A.There is a limit of your happine no matter how much you earn.B.The higher your income is, the happier you will feel.C.Different people have different feeling of happine.D.Americans feel happier than people from other countries.4.What can we learn from Paragraph 7?(原创)

A.People‟s feeling of happine will be stronger with their income rising.B.Sometimes experts make serious mistakes about the effect of money on happine.C.It takes great effort to prove the effect of money on happine.D.People won‟t feel happier with their imcome rising when it come to some degree.5.The auther actually tells us___________.(原创)

A.That we should pursue inner feeling of happine.B.That we should try to make more money if we want to be happier.C.That happine can be measured by the amount of money which we earn.D.That comparing our belongs with others‟ can make us happier.6.Which of the following items can be used to take the place of “evolved”?(原创)

A.ledB.advancedC.developedD.Progreed

KeyCBBDAC

C

In the middle of a hot July afternoon, when the stifling air came with rippling waves of

heat, I became a thief of some sort—a thief of music.For the first time, I had created an original piano arrangement of one of my favorite songs.Not once had I looked for the help of premade sheet music or video tutorials on YouTube.Using only my ears and iPod, I had transformed a mix of intermingling sounds and intricate melodies into the tones of a single instrument;I had created complex harmonies and voices into something I could perform with only two hands.No help, no guide: I had done it on my own.I‟ve been a pianist since before my hands were big enough to reach an octave: with a musician and composer for a father, I was all but born on the piano bench.For many years, my musical identity was defined by the notes that others had written in centuries past: elegant lines of neatly printed notes stamped acro sheet music became the script I was obligated to perform.I valued playing claical music—adored it, even—but such performances felt inherently shallow, lacking in depth and details because I had nothing of my own to contribute to the masterful compositions of Bach or Rachmaninov.This was why, when I added the finishing touches to my piano version of a modern alt-rock song, my pride was all-consuming and glorious: this arrangement was mine.What I‟d done seemed magical: an ability to take what had already existed—to “steal” a song from my favorite band—and to change it into something different and all my own.I was a thief, but I was also an artist.In music, as in other aspects of life, I believe that true originality rarely exists.Almost everything has, in one form or another, been done before.The most paionate romance novel may very well be a slightly changed version of a play by Shakespeare, which in turn is borrowed from the playwrights of Ancient Greece: same themes, different characters, different circumstances.But, the novel is no le deserving of praise just because its uniquene is compromised.Adaptation is not a synonym for failure.The gift of creativity is the ability to do what I did on the piano: to find something beautiful, to analyze and twist it and lose yourself in the mystery of its composition, and then to make it new.Such an act is not copying;it is finding inspiration and having the strength and the innovation to use it as fuel for your own masterpiece.The world is nothing more than disparate collections of preexisting parts—scattered and often lost in the chaos of everyday life.I believe it is my job, as an artist, to rearrange this world into what I envision it to be.I refuse to live as if I were trapped within the walls of a museum: looking but never touching, afraid to ruin the so-called perfection of the artifacts inside.Therefore, I will embrace my ability to be a thief, because if I don‟t steal what the world has to offer, I‟ll never have the tools to share with others a creation of my own.1.The paage can probably be titled as____________(原创)

A.Life of a pianistB.A thiefC.RearrangementD.A music thief

2.According to the author, _____________.(原创)

A.We can hardly regard anything as true originality.B.All plays written by Shakespeare were completely created by him.C.As a musician, one should compose any piece of music all alone.D.A piece of music adapted from others can‟t be a succe.3.What can we learn from the paage?(原创)

A.The author felt ashamed because he once stole music from other musicians.B.The author became a pianist when he graduated from university.C.The author was unhappy with his performance of playing claical music.D.A pianist should strictly follow the original script while playing claical music.4.When the author called himself “a thief of music”, ____________.(原创)

A.He was in real and deep self accusation.B.He didn‟t really mean it.C.He admitted his mistake but felt it was OK.D.He just wanted to play a trick on readers.5.The last sentence really tells us _____________.(原创)

A.Life should be original instead of following others‟ examples.B.Life can also be stolen from others who have already been succeful.C.A meaningful life is adapted from others‟ of some sort.D.If you want to live a promising life, you must follow the track of succeful people.6.Where can we probably read this paage?(原创)

A.In a novelB.In entertianment section of a newspaper

C.In a science fictionD.In a magazine

Key: DACBCD

下载高考阅读模拟word格式文档
下载高考阅读模拟.doc
将本文档下载到自己电脑,方便修改和收藏。
点此处下载文档

文档为doc格式

相关专题 高考数学理模拟
    热门文章
      整站推荐
        点击下载本文