gun control由刀豆文库小编整理，希望给你工作、学习、生活带来方便，猜你可能喜欢“guncontrol英语作文”。
Topic: Gun control has aroused great debates in the society.Gun advocates claim that gun can protect innocent citizens while opponents refute that gun brings more damages to the citizens than benefits.What do you think of the iue?
For
1.Gun control has been a major iue in American politics over the last few years, partly due to a series of tragic maacres involving children.一系列包括儿童在内的残杀
2.Gun control is the perfect solution to crime.对犯罪的完美解决方案
3.The only function of a gun is to kill.The more instruments of death and injury can be removed from our society, the safer it will be.枪的唯一的功能是残杀。多一点死伤手段从社会移除，我们就会更安全。
4.In the U.S.A death by gunshot has become the leading cause of death among some social groups.Quite simply, guns are lethal and the fewer people have them the better.在美国，枪杀成为社会的主要死因。很简单，枪是致命的，最好越少人拥有它们。
5.Legal ownership of guns by law-abiding citizens inevitably leads to many unneceary and tragic deaths.Legally held guns are stolen and end up in the hands of criminals, who would have greater difficulty in obtaining such weapons if firearms were le prevalent in society.守法的公民对枪支的合法拥有权将不可避免地导致很多没必要的惨死。合法拥有的抢被偷到罪犯的手中，如果轻武器在社会上没那么普及，那么罪犯要获得这些武器就不会那么轻而易举了。
6.Guns also end up in the hands of children, leading to tragic accidents and terrible disasters such as the Columbine High School maacre in the U.S.A.枪同样进了儿童手中，可导致严重事故和特大灾难，如美国的科隆比纳高中枪杀案。
Against
1.For many people, guns are part of their culture.They hunt for their dinner with guns and they also hunt as a sport.对很多人来说，枪支是他们的一种文化。他们用枪来狩猎他们的午餐并且把打猎视为一种运动。
2.Many hunters have guns that have been past down for generations in their family.These are mostly people educated on gun safety that use their guns wisely and not foolishly.很多猎人在使用在大家族中代代留传的枪支。他们大多数接受过枪支安全教育，要明智地而不是愚蠢地使用枪支。
3.They pose no harm to other humans, so why must their freedom and culture be taken away? In this situation, guns should not be taken away from them.他们没有给其他人造成任何危害，所以为什么他们的自由和文化要被剥夺？在这种情况下，他们为什么不能使用枪？
4.The government can put regulations on guns, but should not necearily banish guns all together.The government just needs to set boundaries to help protect the people who need it the most.政府可以立法管制枪支，但没有必要但枪支一竿子打死。政府只需要定下边界去帮助那些最需要帮助的人。
5.Any country is much more able to defend itself from aggreion if many of its citizens are able to use guns, keeping them for leisure and sporting use.如果一个国家里有很多公民会在消遣和运动项目中使用枪，那么这个国家的反侵略能力绰绰有余。
6.Some countries actively require adult citizens to maintain weapons in their house, and periodically to train in their use.一些国家积极地要求成年公民在自家储存武器，然后周期性的在训练中使用它们。
7.Of course, such widespread ownership of weapons is also a safeguard against domestic tyranny.当然，这些普遍的武器所有权也是遏制国内暴政和专制的保护措施。
8.Guns are a great thing when handled responsibly.当负责使用时，枪支是好东西。
9.Widespread gun ownership is one of the best deterrents to crime as well as to potential tyranny, whether by gangs or by government.普遍拥有枪支是最好的威慑犯罪，以及向潜在的暴政，不论是帮派或政府。
10.Criminals don't obey the law.Strict gun laws, probably only affect the actions of people who wouldn't commit crimes in the first place.Without the fear of retaliation from victims who might be packing heat, criminals in poeion of these weapons now have a much easier job, and the incidence of gun-related crime has risen.As the saying goes, “If guns are outlawed, only outlaws will have guns.”
maacres大屠杀gun control枪械管制gunshot枪击legal ownership of guns 合法拥有枪law-abiding citizen 守法公民firearms火器、轻武器
prevalent普遍的、流行的 pose构成regulation规章banish驱除、消除boundaries界限aggreion侵略leisure闲暇sporting use体育用途 periodically周期性地widespread广泛的safeguard保护、捍卫domestic国内的、家庭的tyranny暴政、专制responsibly负责任地
Thesis statement: Crimes committed with guns will not bereduced whether we adopt tougher gun control laws or not;thus,a more effective way is to remove illegal guns from public places.I.Introduction
More gun control laws won’t work.II.Development
A.Strict restrictions of lawfully purchased guns will reduce the
power of respectable people to defend themselves without
affecting much of the illegal guns.Thus, we should remove
guns from dangerous people by making frisks in public
places.(criticize gun control advocates)
1.Legal restraints on the lawful purchase of guns
will have little effect on the illegal use of
guns.a.Only a small number of legally purchased guns
are used in crimes.(200million, 1/3, 2%)
b.Most of the guns used in crimes are obtained
illegally.(1/6)
2.Any succeful effort to shrink the stock of
legally purchased guns would reduce the capacity
of law-abiding people to defend themselves.(survey by a criminologist: a million times/year in
3.Our goal should be to reduce illegal guns from
a.A frisk based on reasonable suspicion is
b.Police officers are reluctant to frisk people,fearing the risks of violating the law or police
c.The risk can be greatly reduced if the police have
proper training and frisk particularly people on
4.Self –defense with guns is very effective
deterrence and the risks of self-injury or fatal
a.Self-defense greatly help to deter
criminals.(National Crime Survey,statistics, comparison of occupied homes in
b.It is le likely to cause self-injury or
accidents.(the level of gun ownership, gun
accident and car accident, fewer than
B.Severe punishment is not so practical as to deter the
criminals.Frisks with the help of modern science of
technology can reduce the illegal guns in public places and
1.We often fail to punish the criminals severely.2.Guns would increase the magnitude of the crime
even if the criminals are afraid of severe
3.Modern science and technology can help to take
the illegal guns away from the dangerous people.III.Summary
Although there will be some complaints, we have to make
The Gun Control Debate The gun control debate in America is a battle between personal freedom and public safety.For nearly 160 years, there were no limits to the Second Amendment, which guarantees “the right of the people to keep and bear arms.” In 1934, however, and especially in the last four decades, Americans have begun to proscribe and debate the extent of that right.The National Firearms Act of 1934 was the first restriction on gun rights in American history.As a result, fully automatic weapons are available only after an extensive background check on the owner.In 1968, the term “gun control” gained new meaning with the paage of the federal Gun Control Act.Ratified in the wake of two important political aainations--Robert Kennedy and Martin Luther King, Jr.--the Act requires that all guns carry serial numbers forever tied to the original purchaser.Additionally, it prohibited gun ownership by convicted felons and, as a result of a 1990s amendment, it requires a criminal background check for purchasers at the time of sale.Certain states have their own gun control legislation, although all are governed by the federal Act of 1968.Individual states can deem their own levels of restriction on concealed weapons and “open carry,” or the visible transporting of a weapon.And restrictions vary widely by state, with New York and Illinois seen as the most restrictive and Arizona and Texas, the most relaxed.The latest incarnation of thehas been in the form of the Aault Weapons Ban of 1994, which Congre failed to uphold in its latest seion.The law prohibited the sale of any semi-automatic aault weapons manufactured after 1994.Supporters of the ban said it helped keep violent weapons off the street, while
opponents claimed it imposed a confusing claification system, was overly restrictive and had little effect on controlling violent crime.Gun rights advocates argue that a well-armed public helps prevent crime and ensure personal safety.Gun control proponents, on the other hand, fear that widespread gun ownership actually increases crime rates and leads to other negative outcomes, both public and private.Is the Second Amendment out-of-date, or does it guarantee an integral right?
Opine Tree encourageson today's most controversial political topics, including abortion, affirmative action, cloning, the death penalty, euthanasia, gay marriage, gun control, health care, social security, stem cells, as well as other debate topics.
